Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Sign in with Facebook Sign in with Twitter Sign in with Google Sign in with Linkedin Sign in with Microsoft

Hello! Welcome to the Ford and Volkswagen MPV / SUV Forums.
Dedicated forums for the Ford Galaxy, S-Max, C-Max, B-Max and Kuga.
User groups for the SEAT Alhambra, Volkswagen Sharan, Touran, Tiguan and Touareg!

Owners Forums for Ford and Volkswagen MPVs / SUVs

Ford Galaxy S-Max C-Max B-Max Tourneo Connect / Volkswagen Sharan Touran Tiguan Touareg Caravelle / SEAT Alhambra Alteca 

 Mk1 and Mk2 VW Sharan  Mk1 and Mk2 Ford Galaxy  Mk1 and Mk2 SEAT Alhambra  Ford C-Max B-Max  VW Tiguan  VW Touran  Mk3 Ford Galaxy  Mk3 VW Sharan  Mk3 SEAT Alhambra  VW T4 T5 Caravelle Transporter  Ford Tourneo Connect  VW Touareg

Advert:


Recent Forum Topics:

Google Translate:

Ford Galaxy Mk3 Forum:

Author Topic: Mk3 1.8 or 2.0 ???  (Read 2556 times)

Offline PD1000

  • *
  • Posts: 34
  • Thanked: 0
  • Model: Galaxy Mk3
  • Spec: 2012 TDI 138 Zetec
  • Region: Non UK
  • Country: United Kingdom
Mk3 1.8 or 2.0 ???
« on: July 04, 2016, 11:14:01 PM »
Hi, I searched the posts, but, can't find a debate on which is best, 1.8 or 2.0 Tdci.  Any opinions welcome cos some say the 2.0 is better and there are expenses  with the wet belts on the 1.8. I have no experience with either, yet!

Offline johnnyroper

  • *
  • Posts: 2948
  • Thanked: 148
  • Model: Galaxy Mk2
  • Spec: 02 tdi 115 ghia
  • Region: South West
  • Country: United Kingdom
Re: Mk3 1.8 or 2.0 ???
« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2016, 11:19:11 PM »
My only experience of the 1.8 are a taxi company owner I know has mondeo ones and he has had 3 wet belts fail totalling the engines. If you go down 1.8 route if it has wet belt make sure it has been changed or get it done. Think the kit is about £150 but quite extensive labour involved.

Offline PD1000

  • *
  • Posts: 34
  • Thanked: 0
  • Model: Galaxy Mk3
  • Spec: 2012 TDI 138 Zetec
  • Region: Non UK
  • Country: United Kingdom
Re: Mk3 1.8 or 2.0 ???
« Reply #2 on: July 04, 2016, 11:21:43 PM »
Thanks Johnnyroper for your reply, does all 1.8s have wet belts?

Offline davetech

  • *
  • Posts: 29
  • Thanked: 1
  • Model: Galaxy Mk3
  • Spec: 08 TDCi 2.2 Ghia
  • First Name: Dave
  • Region: South West
  • Country: United Kingdom
Re: Mk3 1.8 or 2.0 ???
« Reply #3 on: July 05, 2016, 08:15:11 AM »
Depending on age of vehicle you are looking for, have you considered the 2.2 TDCi?
A friend of mine had a 2.0 SMax which he said was infinitely better and less troublesome than his 1.8, but the 2.2 has a specially balanced camshaft which makes the engine smooth; he is always envious when he is in it.
I've not had a single mechanical problem with my 8 year old 2.2 (although my mileage is low).
Mk II 1.9 Ghia 115 TDi
Mk II 1.9 Ghia 130 TDi
Mk II 1.9 Ghia 150 TDi
Mk III 2.0 Ghia 140 TDCi
Mk III 2.0 Ghia 140 TDCi
Mk III 2.2 Ghia 175 TDCi

Offline johnnyroper

  • *
  • Posts: 2948
  • Thanked: 148
  • Model: Galaxy Mk2
  • Spec: 02 tdi 115 ghia
  • Region: South West
  • Country: United Kingdom
Re: Mk3 1.8 or 2.0 ???
« Reply #4 on: July 05, 2016, 08:57:06 AM »
Thanks Johnnyroper for your reply, does all 1.8s have wet belts?

I am led to believe some are chain drive but don't know if there is a definitive way to tell as both are encased. If it was me and I bought one I would factor in cost of replacement and have done for peace of mind. I think ford recommend 125k Mile/10 year intervals but I would not be letting it go that long. Max I would go is 80k/8 years.

Offline Chrispb

  • Mindsaysyesbodysaysnono
  • *
  • Posts: 3024
  • Thanked: 112
  • Model: Galaxy Mk2 Auto
  • Spec: 52reg TDI 115 Ghia
  • First Name: Chris
  • Region: South East
  • Country: United Kingdom
Re: Mk3 1.8 or 2.0 ???
« Reply #5 on: July 05, 2016, 09:21:20 AM »
The focus that uses the lynx engine (1.8) went from the wet chain to a wet belt in January 2008 and recommend both belts changed at the same time.
I would assume from that that the Galaxy with the 1.8 Lynx engine will be similar unless anyone knows different.
2009 Kia Sedona GS In Black 2.9CRDI 183PS. 5 Speed Manual WAV.
2003 MK2 Galaxy Ghia In Solid Black 1.9 TDI 115PS. 5 Speed Automatic.

Upgraded Eberspächer booster heater  to independent heating with 7 day timer.

With VCDS lite (full version) need a code clearing or want to scan for faults in the north kent area, PM me.
All for a pint of Strongbow.

The FordMPV.com Forum - The free forum for questions and answers relating to the Ford Galaxy, S-Max and C-Max

Offline Jase1

  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • Thanked: 1
  • Model: Galaxy Mk3
  • Spec: 2.2 tdci ghia
  • First Name: Jason
  • Region: Yorkshire
Re: Mk3 1.8 or 2.0 ???
« Reply #6 on: July 07, 2016, 06:08:07 PM »
Weve a 2.2 galaxy and the engine is really smooth and responsive. My mechanic says there the best engines out of the lot. Since they got rid of the 1.9 pd in the mkw

Offline mike wilson

  • *
  • Posts: 467
  • Thanked: 19
  • Model: Galaxy Mk3
  • Spec: 14 TitX 2.0TDCI
  • Region: North East
  • Country: United Kingdom
Re: Mk3 1.8 or 2.0 ???
« Reply #7 on: July 11, 2016, 10:25:34 AM »
It's swings and roundabouts.  There are two belts in the 1.8 and they are expensive to change, needing seals and gaskets, etc. as well as the internal cassette belt.  The 2 and 2.2 have a single, therefore cheaper belt but it is perceived wisdom to change the water pump at belt change time as the belt has to come off to access the pump.  Doesn't work out much cheaper overall.

The real issue is Ford's wording of "maximum recommended change interval" being 125,000 miles, for both.  This means that, if a belt fails earlier, it is not Ford's responsibility.  As there are documented fails at less than half that mileage and many at the 80,000 mile plus range, Ford seems to be trying to remove its customer base.

The previously fitted internal chain cassette is a straight swap for the belt one, albeit hard to source.

 

Advertisement:


SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk